Critics give 14:59 a B-Side Breakdown of 69 (D+), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 80.
The verdict on 14:59
Most critics weren't won over: 4 of 8 liked it.
- Highest 80 Q and AllMusic
- Outlier 40 The Independent, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #2 of Sugar Ray's 4 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The fifth best-reviewed Pop album of 1999 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2003 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Paul Pearson | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne | C+ | 78 | 1999 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Natalie Nichols | 3/4 | 75 | 1999 | “*** SUGAR RAY "14:59" Lava/Atlantic If you thought (or hoped) that Sugar Ray's 15 minutes were up when radio stations finally took "Fly" out of heavy rotation, brace yourself for…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Howling Wolf | 3.5/5 | 70 | 1999 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Stevie Chick | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2005 | “Any ‘cool’ kid in America (dour expression, beaten-up Converse sneakers) already has a cocked sneer trained on Sugar Ray‘s souffli-light, deck-strung, ska-informed, summery pop-rock. And, in the light of their…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan | 3/5 | 60 | 2003 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Tim Perry | 2/5 | 40 | 1999 | “Various 'Soundbombing 2' (Rawkus)” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Sugar Ray
More Pop from around 1999
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply