Sugar Ray

Sugar Ray – Sugar Ray: B-Side Breakdown 72 (C-) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Sugar Ray by Sugar Ray
Released June 6, 2001
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sugar Ray

Sugar Ray

72
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 6 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown72Grade: C-
Approval50%3 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Sugar Ray an early B-Side Breakdown of 72 (C-), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Sugar Ray

3 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

  • Highest 81 Entertainment Weekly
  • Lowest 60 Kerrang!
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Sugar Ray's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of 14:59 (69).
020406080100Kerrang!: 60Los Angeles Times: 63Rolling Stone: 70Q: 80AllMusic: 80Entertainment Weekly: 81 Breakdown 72
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Tom Sinclair B- 81 2001
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Arion Berger 3.5/5 70 2001
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Marc Weingarten 2.5/4 63 2001 “The quintessential skateboard-brat party band uses a palette of sounds (from heavy guitar riffage to buoyant dance beats), a smirky disposition and a lyrical frame of reference that doesn't extend…”
Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Joshua Sindell 3/5 60 2006

More from Sugar Ray

See all Sugar Ray albums ranked

More Rock from around 2001

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply