Critics give Copper Blue a B-Side Breakdown of 88 (B+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 100.
The verdict on Copper Blue
10 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 Mojo
- Lowest 80 Rolling Stone and Q
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Sugar's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of File Under: Easy Listening (84). The seventh best-reviewed album of 1992 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | 2005 | |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | A- | 91 | 1992 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Steve Lamacq | 9/10 | 90 | 1992 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Eric Harvey | 8.9/10 | 89 | 2012 | “Merge's remastered reissues of Bob Mould's early-1990s post-Hüsker Dü records Copper Blue, Beaster, and FU:EL are wonderfully presented documents of a punk legend starting over creatively and emotionally and succeeding…” |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Robert Hilburn | 3.5/4 | 88 | 1992 | “How does Madonna's musical product compare with her literary and film endeavors?.” |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3.5/4 | 88 | 1992 | “Sugar Copper Blue (Rykodisc) (STAR)(STAR)(STAR)1/2 There was a lot to admire on Bob Mould`s two previous solo albums but little to really warm up to, as the singer battled a…” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne | B+ | 88 | 1992 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kevin Ransom | 4/5 | 80 | 1992 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Sugar
More Rock from around 1992
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply