Southpaw Grammar

Morrissey – Southpaw Grammar: B-Side Breakdown 67 (D+) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Southpaw Grammar by Morrissey
Released August 28, 1995
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Morrissey

Southpaw Grammar

67
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 8 critics · 38% approval
B-Side Breakdown67Grade: D+
Approval38%3 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 85.

By the numbers: 3 of 8 critics liked it.

020406080100AllMusic: 50Select: 60Rolling Stone: 60The Guardian: 60Chicago Tribune: 63Los Angeles Times: 75Q: 80Entertainment Weekly: 85 Breakdown 67
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Michele Romero B 85
Q via Wikipediaby Phil Sutcliffe 4/5 80 2005
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Richard Cromelin 3/4 75 1995 “The Beatles-Spector-Morricone orchestral introduction that opens Morrissey's fifth studio album is grandly excessive, but somehow it never capsizes.”
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Brad Webber 2.5/4 63 1995 “Morrissey Southpaw Grammar (Reprise) (star) (star) 1/2 Morrissey’s songs have always been an acquired taste, more so now with his penchant for dismal, downright Dickensian drones. The insistent, yeomanly guitar…”
Select via Wikipediaby Mark Morris 3/5 60 2005
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Al Weisel 3/5 60 1995 “Check out our album review of Artist's Southpaw Grammar on Rolling Stone.com.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan 3/5 60 2005
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 2.5/5 50

More from Morrissey

See all Morrissey albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 1995

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply