Sounds from Nowheresville

The Ting Tings – Sounds from Nowheresville: B-Side Breakdown 57 (F) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Sounds from Nowheresville by The Ting Tings
Released February 24, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Ting Tings

Sounds from Nowheresville

57
B-Side BreakdownGrade F · 10 critics · 30% approval
B-Side Breakdown57Grade: F
Approval30%3 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessContentiousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 48 points of each other

Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 18 to 100.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 18 (Pitchfork) to 100 (The Independent). The Ting Tings's best-reviewed album here since We Started Nothing (2008).

020406080100Pitchfork: 18PopMatters: 40The Guardian: 40Drowned in Sound: 40NME: 50AllMusic: 50Rolling Stone: 70The Telegraph: 80The A.V. Club: 81The Independent: 100 Breakdown 57
The gist
The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill 5/5 100 2012
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Dan Weiss B- 81 2012
The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jody Rosen 3.5/5 70 2012 “Check out our album review of Artist's Sounds From Nowheresville on Rolling Stone.com.”
NME via Wikipediaby Fraser McAlpine 5/10 50 2012
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 2.5/5 50
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Stephen Foster 4/10 40
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 2/5 40 2012
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Simon Jay Catling 4/10 40 2012
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Hari Ashurs 1.8/10 18 2012

More from The Ting Tings

See all The Ting Tings albums ranked

More Rock from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply