Critics give Seventeen Going Under a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 66 to 100.
The verdict on Seventeen Going Under
7 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 The Guardian
- Lowest 66 Pitchfork
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Sam Fender's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of People Watching (79).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 5/5 | 100 | 2021 | “The North Shields songwriter replaces his former broad-brush politicking with rousing but arrestingly bleak, personal material that puts his indie-rock peers in the shade” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Hayden Merrick | 9/10 | 90 | 2021 | “Sam Fender gives a stirring tour through the poverty and politics of middle England on his polished new album, Seventeen Going Under.” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Kieran Macadie | 8/10 | 80 | 2021 | “Sam Fender eloquently paints a backdrop of the English north-east on Seventeen Going Under” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Thomas Smith | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “Lockdown forced the Geordie hero to reckon with the impact of his formative years, resulting this bruising second album” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Roisin O'Connor | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “North Shields’ finest Sam Fender comes back blazing with his second album, while BadBadNotGood are in a more considered mood” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Lucy Harbron | 8/10 | 80 | 2021 | “I’ve said it a thousand times before to anyone who will listen, but there’s something distinct and special about listening to Sam” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Marcy Donelson | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2021 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ethan Shanfeld | 6.6/10 | 66 | 2021 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Sam Fender
← Earlier Hypersonic Missiles (2019)Later → People Watching (2025)
More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply