Critics give Hypersonic Missiles a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 61 to 85.
The verdict on Hypersonic Missiles
7 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 85 The Line of Best Fit
- Lowest 61 Pitchfork
- Career #3 of Sam Fender's 3 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Hayley Milross | 8.5/10 | 85 | 2019 | “Rising singer-songwriter blends political awareness with guitar-fuelled, feel-good indie on impressive debut” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Jordan Bassett | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “The Geordie Springsteen's debut excels at documenting small-town frustration, which is why he means so much to so many people” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Roisin O'Connor | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “There are sax solos (more than one), and pounding rhythms that make you want to jump in a car and drive down a highway at sunset” |
| Clash via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2019 | “Sam Fender is a natural storyteller. It’s as simple as that. He uses his observational lyrics to tell the stories in his songs. Fender has had a” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “The North Shields singer-songwriter may look cookie-cutter but his gritty, gloriously anthemic songs on toxic masculinity, violence and death are anything but” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Hannah Jocelyn | 6.1/10 | 61 | 2019 | “Though the upstart British songwriter is a capable storyteller when he zeroes on a single topic, his debut is only intermittently transcendent.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Sam Fender
More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2019
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply