Raising Hell

Run-DMC – Raising Hell: B-Side Breakdown 94 (Heavy Rotation) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Raising Hell by Run-DMC
Released November 25, 1986
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Run-DMC

Raising Hell

94 A-Side: the critics' top tier
B-Side BreakdownHeavy Rotation · 10 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown94Heavy Rotation
Approval100%10 of 10 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Critics give Raising Hell a B-Side Breakdown of 94 (Heavy Rotation), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 77 to 100.

The verdict on Raising Hell

10 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

020406080100Pitchfork: 77Uncut: 80Robert Christgau: 85Spin Alternative Record Guide: 100The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 100Rolling Stone: 100Q: 100Encyclopedia of Popular Music: 100Chicago Tribune: 100AllMusic: 100 Breakdown 94
The gist
Spin Alternative Record Guide via Wikipedia 10/10 100 2003
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Greg Tate 5/5 100 2004 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Mark Kemp 5/5 100 2002
Q via Wikipedia 5/5 100 2003
Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin 5/5 100 2003
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot 4/4 100 1990 “Run-D.M.C. pioneered hard-core rap, then turned it into pop music with enormous cross-cultural appeal in the `80s. Their history on record: Run-DMC (Profile, 1984) (STAR)(STAR)(STAR)(STAR): A collection of witty, hard-edged…”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 5/5 100
Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau A- 85 1986
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2003
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Tom Breihan 7.7/10 77 2005 “Expanded reissues of the hip-hop legends' first four albums.”

Raising Hell in Run-DMC's catalog

70Run–D.M.C. (1984): 8989King of Rock (1985): 7171Raising Hell (1986): 9494This oneTougher Than Leather (1988): 7070Back from Hell (1990): 5757Down with the King (1993): 6767Crown Royal (2001): 4848Run–D.M.C. – Greatest Hits (2002): 919119842002
Run-DMC's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Run-DMC album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Run-DMC

  • Robert Christgau Harsher than usual10 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Run-DMC's other albums (6).
  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually 10 points below on Run-DMC's other albums (4).
  • Rolling Stone Kinder than usual6 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Run-DMC's other albums (6).
  • AllMusic About usual for them6 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Run-DMC's other albums (7).

More from Run-DMC

See all Run-DMC albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 1986

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply