Based on 13 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 92.
By the numbers: Arcade Fire's best-reviewed album here since The Suburbs (2010). Scores ran from 50 (PopMatters) to 92 (Pitchfork).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchfork via Wikipedia | 9.2/10 | 92 | 2013 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2013 | |
| Slant | 4.5/5 | 90 | “Reflektor coheres into a sustained meditation on the fragility of human connection.” | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipedia | B | 85 | 2022 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | B | 85 | ||
| The Independent via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | |
| The Telegraph via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Spin via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | “The experience of the advance "listening session" is an unnatural way to hear an album, especially for the first time: You've got one chance to conjure” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| musicOMH | 3.5/5 | 70 | “Back in the spring, when Get Lucky by Daft Punk was strutting its way onto every single radio station on the globe, the duo's fans were prepping for” | |
| The Guardian via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | |
| PopMatters | 5/10 | 50 | “The Reflektor Tapes finds Arcade Fire and director Kahlil Joseph working hard to re-invent the “making of an album” music documentary. They seem to be” |
More from Arcade Fire
More Indie & Alternative from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply