Critics give More Light a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on More Light
7 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 AllMusic
- Lowest 60 The Guardian
- Career #3 of Primal Scream's 9 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Primal Scream's best-reviewed album here since XTRMNTR (2000).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Annie Zaleski | B+ | 88 | 2013 | “Primal Scream: More Light” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Lucy Jones | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | “When a despot or serial killer dies, it’s customary to remember their victims. So while pockets of the UK pull on their grave-dancing shoes and sycophantic moron Boris Johnson blubbers…” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Joe Wilson | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 7.7/10 | 77 | 2013 | “On Primal Scream’s most impassioned, lustrous, and expansive album since XTRMNTR, they’re not so much interested in toppling oppressive institutions as devising the psychic survival strategies required to withstand them.” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Graeme Thomson | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Joe Gross | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | “Check out our album review of Artist's More Light on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | “There's a genuine masterpiece on this album, which begins and ends strongly but dips in the middle, writes Michael Hann” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Primal Scream
More Indie & Alternative from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply