Chaosmosis

Primal Scream – Chaosmosis: B-Side Breakdown 67 (D+) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Chaosmosis by Primal Scream
Released March 18, 2016
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Primal Scream

Chaosmosis

67
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 10 critics · 30% approval
B-Side Breakdown67Grade: D+
Approval30%3 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Critics give Chaosmosis a B-Side Breakdown of 67 (D+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 85.

The verdict on Chaosmosis

Most critics weren't won over: 3 of 10 liked it.

020406080100AllMusic: 50Spin: 60PopMatters: 60Pitchfork: 60The Guardian: 60Exclaim!: 60Clash: 70NME: 80DIY: 80The A.V. Club: 85 Breakdown 67
The gist
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Lily Moayeri B 85 2016 “Primal Scream finds calm amongst the chaos”
NME via Wikipediaby Barry Nicolson 4/5 80 2016 “The title of Primal Scream’s 11th album might sound like something band leader Bobby Gillespie dreamt up while under the influence, but ‘Chaosmosis’ is actually a highfalutin reference to French…”
DIY via Wikipediaby Matthew Davies Lombardi 4/5 80 2016 “More than anything it proves that having fun and doing exactly what you feel like is never going out of style.”
Clash via Wikipediaby Gareth James 7/10 70 2016
Spin via Wikipediaby Dan Weiss 6/10 60 2016 “6SPIN Rating: 6 of 10Release Date: March 18, 2016Label: First InternationalPrimal Scream should not be the kind of band people still care about, much less”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Matt James 6/10 60 2016 “Primal Scream's waiflike but coolly charismatic captain Bobby Gillespie clearly knows how pop works. In the 30-plus years he's been in the boogie game, he's”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman 6.0/10 60 2016 “At a time when the remaining bands of their vintage are locked into the album-retrospective tour circuit or releasing pro-forma records, Primal Scream’s 11th full-length sees them keeping pace with…”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tim Jonze 3/5 60 2016
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Cam Lindsay 6/10 60 2016
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 2.5/5 50

Chaosmosis in Primal Scream's catalog

75Sonic Flower Groove (1987): 5252Primal Scream (1989): 5454Give Out But Don’t Give Up (1994): 7373Vanishing Point (1997): 8787XTRMNTR (2000): 8383Evil Heat (2002): 6868Riot City Blues (2006): 6868Beautiful Future (2008): 5353More Light (2013): 7676Chaosmosis (2016): 6767This one1987
Primal Scream's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Primal Scream album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Primal Scream

  • AllMusic Harsher than usual18 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Primal Scream's other albums (9).
  • The Guardian About usual for them7 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Primal Scream's other albums (6).
  • NME About usual for them15 points above the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on Primal Scream's other albums (6).
  • Pitchfork About usual for them7 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on Primal Scream's other albums (6).

More from Primal Scream

See all Primal Scream albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2016

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply