No Line on the Horizon

U2 – No Line on the Horizon: B-Side Breakdown 75 (C) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for No Line on the Horizon by U2
Released February 25, 2009
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
U2

No Line on the Horizon

75
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 8 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown75Grade: C
Approval50%4 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 36 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 42 to 100.

By the numbers: U2's best-reviewed album here since How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb (2004). Scores ran from 42 (Pitchfork) to 100 (Q).

020406080100Pitchfork: 42Slant: 60NME: 70AllMusic: 70musicOMH: 80Mojo: 80Q: 100Rolling Stone: 100 Breakdown 75
The gist
Q via Wikipediaby Paul Rees 5/5 100
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke 5/5 100 2009
musicOMHby Talia Soghomonian 4/5 80 2009 “During 2001's Elevation Tour, Bono joked that U2 were once again competing for the title of World's Greatest Rock Band, in reference to their foray into”
Mojo via Wikipediaby Keith Cameron 4/5 80
NME via Wikipediaby Ben Patashnik 7/10 70 2009
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 3.5/5 70
Slantby Sal Cinquemani 3/5 60 2009 “The album is a compromise between the experimental and the pedestrian.”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ryan Dombal 4.2/10 42 2009

More from U2

See all U2 albums ranked

More Rock from around 2009

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply