Junk

M83 – Junk: B-Side Breakdown 66 (D) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Junk by M83
Released April 8, 2016
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
M83

Junk

66
B-Side BreakdownGrade D · 10 critics · 30% approval
B-Side Breakdown66Grade: D
Approval30%3 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 38 points of each other

Critics give Junk a B-Side Breakdown of 66 (D), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Mojo) to 100 (Q).

020406080100Rolling Stone: 40Mojo: 40Chicago Tribune: 50Spin: 60The Guardian: 60Pitchfork: 68Uncut: 70AllMusic: 80The A.V. Club: 91Q: 100 Breakdown 66
The gist
Q via Wikipediaby Simon Price 5/5 100
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby John Everhart A- 91 2016
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4/5 80
Uncut via Wikipediaby Piers Martin 7/10 70 2016
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby T. Cole Rachel 6.8/10 68 2016 “The new M83 album almost makes you wonder: How much can you mine vintage sounds without them finally falling apart?”
Spin via Wikipediaby Harley Brown 6/10 60 2016 “6SPIN Rating: 6 of 10Release Date: April 08, 2016Label: MuteThe closest we may ever come to hearing Anthony Gonzalez's high-school band, My Violent Wish”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Paul MacInnes 3/5 60 2016
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot 2/4 50 2016
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Suzy Exposito 2/5 40 2016 “Check out our album review of Artist's Junk on Rolling Stone.com.”
Mojo via Wikipediaby Stephen Worthy 2/5 40

More from M83

See all M83 albums ranked

More Electronic from around 2016

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply