Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 85.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (The Guardian) to 85 (Entertainment Weekly).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Brad Wete | B | 85 | ||
| Paste via Wikipediaby Holly Gleason | 7.5/10 | 75 | 2011 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Kenny Herzog | C | 75 | 2011 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2011 | “Recorded over six days in Nashville with Dave Stewart, the debut release on Joss Stone's own label is, she claims, the first on which she has exerted total creative freedom.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Caryn Ganz | 3/5 | 60 | 2011 | “Check out our album review of Artist's LP1 on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| Slant via Wikipediaby Matthew Cole | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2011 | “Joss Stone’s fifth album continues the British soul singer’s tendency to present every release as a brand new beginning.” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Colin McGuire | 4/10 | 40 | 2011 | “Oh boy, Joss Stone is angry.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Paul MacInnes | 2/5 | 40 | 2011 | “Joss Stone's starting all over again. She needn't have bothered, Paul MacInnes says” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Joss Stone
More Pop from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply