Introducing Joss Stone

Joss Stone – Introducing Joss Stone: B-Side Breakdown 55 (F) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Introducing Joss Stone by Joss Stone
Released January 1, 2007
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Joss Stone

Introducing Joss Stone

55
B-Side BreakdownGrade F · 9 critics · 11% approval
B-Side Breakdown55Grade: F
Approval11%1 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 34 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 20 to 81.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 20 (NME) to 81 (Entertainment Weekly). Only one of 9 critics liked it: Entertainment Weekly, at 81.

020406080100NME: 20musicOMH: 40The Independent: 40Rolling Stone: 60The Guardian: 60Slant: 60AllMusic: 60PopMatters: 70Entertainment Weekly: 81 Breakdown 55
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B- 81
PopMatters 7/10 70 “Based on her first two albums, there was a lot that rubbed me the wrong way about Joss Stone. First, she was hailed as this great British soul singer, like”
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3/5 60
The Guardian via Wikipedia 3/5 60
Slant 3/5 60 “It’s the rare album that values vocal talent and production prowess with equal measure.”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3/5 60
musicOMHby John Murphy 2/5 40 2007 “Introducing Joss Stone may seem a weird title for the singer's third album, but not according to Ms Stone herself. See, she wasn't much of a fan of her”
The Independent via Wikipedia 2/5 40
NME via Wikipedia 2/10 20 2007 “Missed Joss Stone at the Brits acting like a tosser in front of an audience of millions? Never mind, her new record is packed with just as much lip-gnawing wobble…”

More R&B & Soul from around 2007

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply