Based on 13 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 10 to 91.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 10 (PopMatters) to 91 (Entertainment Weekly). Only one of 13 critics liked it: Entertainment Weekly, at 91.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Brad Wete | A- | 91 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2011 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Lasers on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Spectrum Culture | 3.3/5 | 66 | “Lupe Fiasco Lasers Rating: 3.3/5.0 Label: Atlantic The return of Lupe Fiasco is a lot like the (pretty good) opening 20 minutes of Die Another Day, when James Bond gets…” | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Todd Martens | 2.5/4 | 63 | 2011 | “This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links.” |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Chris Jones | 2.5/4 | 63 | Oct 29, 2026 | |
| Spinby Brandon Soderberg | 6/10 | 60 | 2011 | “6SPIN Rating: 6 of 10Release Date: March 08, 2011Label: 1st & 15th/AtlanticLupe Fiasco's oft-delayed, way too overthought third album fuses the seething,” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| Slant | 2.5/5 | 50 | “Lupe’s half-assed, club-ready radicalism is ultimately the most frustrating thing about Lasers.” | |
| Beats Per Minute | 49% | 49 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alex Macpherson | 2/5 | 40 | 2011 | “There are glimpses of brilliance on Lupe Fiasco's new album, but too few, reckons Alex Macpherson” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 2/5 | 40 | 2011 | “There's a tendency in hip-hop for performers to spread themselves too thinly, with endless guest spots. Originally planned for a 2009 release, Lupe Fiasco's follow-up to The Cool has been…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 3.0/10 | 30 | 2011 | “A huge misstep, Lupe Fiasco's new LP simply sounds bad, playing against every single one of his strengths and creating new weaknesses.” |
| PopMatters | 1/10 | 10 | “More than anything, I just feel bad for Lupe Fiasco and his fans. Good artists don't deserve this. My jaw remains affixed to the ground.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Lupe Fiasco
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply