Food & Liquor II: The Great American Rap Album Pt. 1

Lupe Fiasco – Food & Liquor II: The Great American Rap Album Pt. 1: B-Side Breakdown 67 (D+) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Food & Liquor II: The Great American Rap Album Pt. 1 by Lupe Fiasco
Released September 21, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Lupe Fiasco

Food & Liquor II: The Great American Rap Album Pt. 1

67
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 8 critics · 25% approval
B-Side Breakdown67Grade: D+
Approval25%2 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 85.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (The Guardian) to 85 (The A.V. Club).

020406080100The Guardian: 40Spin: 60Rolling Stone: 60Pitchfork: 68PopMatters: 70AllMusic: 70The A.V. Club: 85Entertainment Weekly: 85 Breakdown 67
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Evan Rytlewski B 85
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B 85
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Colin McGuire 7/10 70
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman 3.5/5 70
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jayson Greene 6.8/10 68
Spin via Wikipediaby Mosi Reeves 6/10 60
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jody Rosen 3/5 60
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Paul MacInnes 2/5 40

More from Lupe Fiasco

See all Lupe Fiasco albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply