Flying Microtonal Banana

King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard – Flying Microtonal Banana: B-Side Breakdown 73 (C) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Flying Microtonal Banana by King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard
Released February 24, 2017
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard

Flying Microtonal Banana

73
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 9 critics · 56% approval
B-Side Breakdown73Grade: C
Approval56%5 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 80.

By the numbers: 5 of 9 critics liked it.

020406080100Q: 60Mojo: 60The Guardian: 60Pitchfork: 74Record Collector: 80Uncut: 80DIY: 80Exclaim!: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 73
The gist
Record Collector via Wikipediaby Cody Ray Shafer 4/5 80 “Psychedelic indie rock outfit King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard have already released eight records since their 2012 debut.”
Uncut via Wikipediaby Jason Anderson 8/10 80 2017
DIY via Wikipediaby Liam Konemann 4/5 80 2017
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Cosette Schulz 8/10 80 2017
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman 7.4/10 74 2017 “On this sprawling new album, the Australian psych-rock band hoists its freak flag a few inches higher up the pole. It flutters in a more gentle breeze.”
Q via Wikipediaby Ian Harrison 3/5 60 2017
Mojo via Wikipediaby Chris Nelson 3/5 60 2017
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Paul Mardles 3/5 60 2017

More from King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard

See all King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard albums ranked

More Rock from around 2017

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply