Critics give Omnium Gatherum a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (Keeper), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.
The verdict on Omnium Gatherum
Critics split on this one: scores run from 50 (AllMusic) to 100 (Louder Than War).
- Highest 100 Louder Than War
- Lowest 50 AllMusic
- Career Tied for #10 of King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's 13 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louder Than War via Wikipediaby Nathan Whittle | 5/5 | 100 | 2022 | “King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard return (like they ever went away!) with their twentieth album that mashes all their styles into one.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Sam Walker-Smart | 9/10 | 90 | 2022 | “Music Review: King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard – Omnium Gatherum” |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Julian Marszalek | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “Aussie cosmonauts King Gizzard And The Lizard Wizard hit melodious peak with freakouts and chill-outs on Omnium Gatherum” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 7.3/10 | 73 | 2022 | |
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Kyle Kersey | 3/5 | 60 | 2022 | “For two years, Australia’s most relentless rockers King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard couldn’t record together. The pandemic essentially shutdown Melbourne, the band’s base of operations, not allowing the members…” |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Kevin Harvey | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Mark Blake | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2022 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Omnium Gatherum in King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's catalog
How these critics usually treat King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard
- AllMusic Harsher than usual25 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's other albums (11).
- Louder Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 10 points below on King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's other albums (3).
- Under the Radar Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's other albums (5).
- Clash Kinder than usual21 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's other albums (5).
- Record Collector Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's other albums (9).
More from King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard
← Earlier Butterfly 3000 (2021)Later → PetroDragonic Apocalypse; or, Dawn of Eternal Night: An Annihilation of Planet Earth and the Beginning of Merciless Damnation (2023)
More Rock from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply