Quarters!

King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard – Quarters!: B-Side Breakdown 75 (Keeper) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for Quarters! by King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard
Released May 1, 2015
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard

Quarters!

75
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 3 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown75Keeper
Approval67%2 of 3 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 14 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Quarters! an early B-Side Breakdown of 75 (Keeper), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Quarters!

So far, 2 of 3 critics liked it.

020406080100The Line of Best Fit: 65The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 75
The gist
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Everett True 4/5 80 2015 “One ridiculously cuddly melody follows another in the Melbourne band’s sixth album, which sits at the neon intersection of DIY psych and 1960s beach pop”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra 4/5 80
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Tamlin Magee 6.5/10 65 2015 “Four tracks, each ten minutes and ten seconds long. Par for the course for this lot, really.”

Quarters! in King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's catalog

70I’m in Your Mind Fuzz (2014): 76Quarters! (2015): 7575This onePaper Mâché Dream Balloon (2015): 76Nonagon Infinity (2016): 83Flying Microtonal Banana (2017): 72Murder of the Universe (2017): 69Infest the Rats’ Nest (2019): 72K.G. – Explorations Into Microtonal Tuning Volume 2 (2020): 75L.W. (2021): 76Butterfly 3000 (2021): 73Omnium Gatherum (2022): 72PetroDragonic Apocalypse; or, Dawn of Eternal Night: An Annihilation of Planet Earth and the Beginning of Merciless Damnation (2023): 75Flight b741 (2024): 7520142024
King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard album, ranked

How these critics usually treat King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard

  • The Line of Best Fit Harsher than usual15 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's other albums (4).
  • AllMusic Kinder than usual8 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's other albums (11).
  • The Guardian About usual for them8 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard's other albums (5).

More from King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard

See all King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2015

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply