Illinois

Sufjan Stevens – Illinois: B-Side Breakdown 89 (B+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Illinois by Sufjan Stevens
Released July 4, 2005
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sufjan Stevens

Illinois

89
B-Side BreakdownGrade B+ · 9 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown89Grade: B+
Approval100%9 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 100.

By the numbers: The fourth best-reviewed album of 2005 we've tracked. All 9 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 80, from AllMusic.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 80The Guardian: 80NME: 80AllMusic: 80Entertainment Weekly: 88Pitchfork: 92Slant: 100The Independent: 100Los Angeles Times: 100 Breakdown 89
The gist
Slantby Jonathan Keefe 5/5 100 2005 “The album is pop-art of the highest caliber, cementing Stevens as one of the most vital voices in music today.”
The Independent via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 4/4 100
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 9.2/10 92 “On the second installment of his absurdly ambitious "50 States" project, Stevens presents the 74-minute spectacular Illinois. In the wake of last year's quieter Seven Swans, this album finds the…”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B+ 88
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80
The Guardian via Wikipedia 4/5 80
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80

More from Sufjan Stevens

See all Sufjan Stevens albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2005

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply