Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of The Raconteurs's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Consolers of the Lonely (78).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jeremy Winograd | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2019 | “The album proves that there’s still more to be mined from the supposedly anachronistic guitar-rock template.” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Lisa Wright | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2019 | “Something if not greater, then at least as good as the sum of their considerable parts.” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis | B | 85 | 2019 | “Jack White's reliable side-project with Brendan Benson returns 11 years later with crisp riffs and tight harmonies.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Andrew Trendell | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “The NME review of Jack White and Brendan Benson's supergroup The Raconteurs' long-awaited third album 'Help Us Stranger” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Alex Hudson | 8/10 | 80 | 2019 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3/4 | 75 | 2019 | “Jack White’s recent solo albums have been wildly erratic, as if he were trying too hard to find an identity outside the long-gone White Stripes, his powerhouse Detroit duo with…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Peyton Thomas | 6.4/10 | 64 | 2019 | “After an 11-year hiatus, the first album from Jack White’s other other band floats in weightless, haughty bliss through a perpetual 2008.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rachel Aroesti | 3/5 | 60 | 2019 | “Jack White’s eccentricity is well contained by his bandmates, but the macho politics undermine the tautness” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from The Raconteurs
More Indie & Alternative from around 2019
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply