Critics give Dreamland a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 57 to 100.
The verdict on Dreamland
7 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIY via Wikipediaby Jenessa Williams | 5/5 | 100 | 2020 | “Rose-tinted nostalgia for the perfect summer.” |
| musicOMHby Jason Binns | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | “A hip-hop influence pervades, but the blueprint remains: dreamy, danceable psych-pop beats providing the backdrop to the most troublesome of memoirs” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Dave Everley | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Roisin O'Connor | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | “Songs are filled with autobiographical details about a childhood growing up in Texas, where frontman Dave Bayley felt at odds with the state’s overwhelmingly macho culture” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Hannah Mylrea | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | “The Oxford band have overcome a period of intense adversity to bring you a record of deeply personal tales – all set to shimmering pop tunes” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 8/10 | 80 | 2020 | “Glass Animals have always communicated through a series of prisms, filtering through thoughts and emotions thoroughly before it reaches their fans. Sure,” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Slant via Wikipediaby Charles Lyons-Burt | 3/5 | 60 | 2020 | “The album makes room for evocative, sensory lyrics and sonics that verge on the cinematic, but it also spends a lot of time on the mundane.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Aimee Cliff | 3/5 | 60 | 2020 | “Trauma has triggered a more inward-looking exploration of the Oxford quartet’s grandstanding, hallucinogenic sound” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 5.7/10 | 57 | 2020 | “The UK psych-pop band stretches out to embrace hip-hop production and personal biography. It comes across like a guy trying to tell you his life story in a packed Coachella…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Glass Animals
More Pop from around 2020
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply