Critics give I Love You So F***ing Much a B-Side Breakdown of 73 (C), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.
The verdict on I Love You So F***ing Much
Critics split on this one: scores run from 40 (Exclaim! and 1 other) to 100 (Dork).
- Highest 100 Dork
- Lowest 40 Exclaim! and The Guardian
- Career #2 of Glass Animals's 2 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Glass Animals's best-reviewed album here since Dreamland (2020).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dork via Wikipediaby Dan Harrison | 5/5 | 100 | 2024 | |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Emma Swann | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2024 | “Confident, self-aware, and ambitious.” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Richards | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “This fourth album – laden with a distinctly 80s feel – proves that Glass Animals still have something important to say.” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Christopher Hamilton-Peach | 8/10 | 80 | 2024 | “An album that meanders between science fiction nods and throwaway pop-culture lines.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 7/10 | 70 | 2024 | “A near-death experience certainly makes you scrutinise your life and in the case of Glass Animals frontman Dave Bayley, he has turned his experience into” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Stevie Chick | 7/10 | 70 | 2024 | “Rapper maintains his signature sharpness of diction throughout – it’s the content on his latest No 1 album that’s at fault” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Matthew Teklemariam | 4/10 | 40 | 2024 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 2/5 | 40 | 2024 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Glass Animals
More Indie & Alternative from around 2024
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply