Futures

Jimmy Eat World – Futures: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Futures by Jimmy Eat World
Released October 11, 2004
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Jimmy Eat World

Futures

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 7 critics · 71% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval71%5 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessContentiousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 40 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 30 (Pitchfork) to 100 (Sputnikmusic). Jimmy Eat World's best-reviewed album here since Clarity (1999).

020406080100Pitchfork: 30Rolling Stone: 70The Guardian: 80Drowned in Sound: 80AllMusic: 80Entertainment Weekly: 81Sputnikmusic: 100 Breakdown 74
The gist
Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Adam Knott 5/5 100 “Jimmy Eat World – Futures review: You'll sit alone forever, if you wait for the right time…”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Brian Hiatt B- 81
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Betty Clarke 4/5 80 2004
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Gareth Dobson 8/10 80 2004
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield 3.5/5 70
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan 3.0/10 30 2004

From B-Side Guys

More from Jimmy Eat World

See all Jimmy Eat World albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2004

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply