Early reviews. Critics give Emily’s D+Evolution an early B-Side Breakdown of 83 (Keeper), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Emily’s D+Evolution
6 of 6 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 PopMatters and AllMusic
- Lowest 70 Exclaim!
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Esperanza Spalding's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Milton + Esperanza (83).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PopMattersby Will Layman | 9/10 | 90 | 2016 | “Esperanza Spalding’s new recording, Emily’s D+Evolution is an astonishing beauty, a set of a dozen songs that artfully and persuasively bridge genres. It is” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marcus J. Moore | 8.6/10 | 86 | 2016 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christopher R. Weingarten | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Emily’s D+Evolution on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby John Fordham | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Michael J. Warren | 7/10 | 70 | 2016 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Emily’s D+Evolution in Esperanza Spalding's catalog
How these critics usually treat Esperanza Spalding
- The Guardian Harsher than usual3 points below the other critics here. Usually 10 points above on Esperanza Spalding's other albums (3).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on Esperanza Spalding's other albums (3).
- AllMusic About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 13 points above on Esperanza Spalding's other albums (5).
More from Esperanza Spalding
← Earlier Radio Music Society (2012)Later → 12 Little Spells (2018)
More Jazz from around 2016
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply