Early reviews. Critics give Radio Music Society an early B-Side Breakdown of 68 (D+), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Radio Music Society
Most critics weren't won over: 2 of 6 liked it.
- Highest 85 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 50 Rolling Stone
- By the numbers The lowest score of Esperanza Spalding's 5 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Mikael Wood | B | 85 | 2012 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby John Fordham | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “This ambitious new album is predominantly poppy, but it took a musician with a very broad view to make it, writes John Fordham” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jonathan Keefe | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 | “Radio Music Society makes it clear that Spalding’s a fine, intuitive singer and a natural bandleader.” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2012 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Radio Music Society on Rolling Stone.com.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Radio Music Society in Esperanza Spalding's catalog
How these critics usually treat Esperanza Spalding
- AllMusic Harsher than usual3 points above the other critics here. Usually 14 points above on Esperanza Spalding's other albums (4).
More from Esperanza Spalding
← Earlier Chamber Music Society (2010)Later → 12 Little Spells (2018)
More Jazz from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply