Margaret Wappler’s album reviews that count toward B-Side Breakdowns: 17 reviews, going back to 2010, each next to the album’s Breakdown.
Is this you? Send us a photoOnly send a photo you took or have the rights to share.Writes for
Los Angeles Times 2010–2011 · 17 reviews
What they review
- Pop 35%
- Indie & Alternative 35%
- R&B & Soul 18%
- Rock 12%
By the numbers
1A-Sides reviewed, the albums the critics rate highest
2years of their reviews we track, 2010 to 2011
88%of their scores landed within 10 points of the other critics’ average for the same album (17 albums)
7points, on average, between their release-week reviews and where the other critics ended up (7 reviews)
How their scores spread
- 0–490
- 50s1
- 60s3
- 70s5
- 80s8
- 90+0
Their favorites
Kate Bush50 Words for Snow 88 Los Angeles Times
Florence + the MachineCeremonials 88 Los Angeles Times
Fleet FoxesHelplessness Blues 88 Los Angeles Times
Janelle MonáeThe ArchAndroid 88 Los Angeles Times
The NationalHigh Violet 88 Los Angeles Times
Artists they keep coming back to
Their scores for each artist, in release order.
A-Sides they reviewed
1 album that earned an A-Side, the critics’ top tier; they scored 1 of them 75 or higher.
Every review
| Outlet | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 88 3.5/4 | 85 | 2011 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 88 3.5/4 | 77 | 2011 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 88 3.5/4 | 82 | 2011 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 50 2/4 | 54 | 2010 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 75 3/4 | 63 | 2010 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 88 3.5/4 | 90 | 2010 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 88 3.5/4 | 82 | 2010 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 75 3/4 | 68 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 75 3/4 | 80 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 63 2.5/4 | 70 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 64 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 88 3.5/4 | 79 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 75 3/4 | 77 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 63 2.5/4 | 62 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 88 3.5/4 | 89 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 75 3/4 | 73 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 88 3.5/4 | 85 |
Is this you? Send a correction. Scores marked via Wikipedia come from the album’s Wikipedia ratings box, which names the critic in its citation. All critics · B-Side Breakdowns home
