High Violet

The National – High Violet: B-Side Breakdown 82 (B-) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for High Violet by The National
Released May 10, 2010
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The National

High Violet

82
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 9 critics · 78% approval
B-Side Breakdown82Grade: B-
Approval78%7 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 95.

By the numbers: The second best-reviewed Indie & Alternative album of 2010 we've tracked.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 70AllMusic: 70Spin: 80The Guardian: 80NME: 80Pitchfork: 87Los Angeles Times: 88Entertainment Weekly: 88The A.V. Club: 95 Breakdown 82
The gist
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Steven Hyden A 95 2010 “The National: High Violet”
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Margaret Wappler 3.5/4 88 2010 “This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links.”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Leah Greenblatt B+ 88
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Andrew Gaerig 8.7/10 87 2010 “Returning with a slightly darker and more ornate sound, the National remain masters of widescreen, emotionally engaging rock.”
Spin via Wikipediaby Josh Modell 8/10 80 2010 “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: May 10, 2010Label: 4ADThe vaguely optimistic slow dance "Vanderlyle Crybaby Geeks" closes the National's fifth album,”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson 4/5 80 2010 “There's a name for the phenomenon the National's fifth album embodies, says Dave Simpson: it's called 'doing an Elbow”
NME via Wikipediaby Adam Kennedy 8/10 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes 3.5/5 70 2010 “Check out our album review of Artist's High Violet on Rolling Stone.com.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby James Christopher Monger 3.5/5 70

More Indie & Alternative from around 2010

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply