Critics give Strange Mercy a B-Side Breakdown of 85 (B), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 63 to 100.
The verdict on Strange Mercy
8 of 10 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 100 The Telegraph
- Lowest 63 Los Angeles Times
- Career Tied for #3 of St. Vincent's 7 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The sixth best-reviewed album of 2011 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby James Lachno | 5/5 | 100 | 2011 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Rob Brunner | A- | 91 | 2011 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Erik Adams | A- | 91 | 2011 | “St. Vincent: Strange Mercy” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Stacey Anderson | 9/10 | 90 | 2011 | “Annie Clark strikes a downright divine balance between scornful rock squall and serenely sweet vocalizing. Her third album is her most mercurial yet, a” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ryan Dombal | 9.0/10 | 90 | 2011 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Jeremy Allen | 9/10 | 90 | 2011 | “Virtuosity and accessibility have never been easy bedfellows, but ‘Strange Mercy’ is one of those rare albums that makes you think and makes you fall in love. If [a]St Vincent[/a]’s…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rebecca Nicholson | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | “Rebecca Nicholson is knocked out by the swooning sensuality of St Vincent” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2011 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Strange Mercy on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Margaret Wappler | 2.5/4 | 63 | 2011 | “This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from St. Vincent
More Indie & Alternative from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply