Critics give SABLE, fABLE a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 15 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.
The verdict on SABLE, fABLE
12 of 15 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 100 DIY
- Lowest 50 AllMusic
- Career #4 of Bon Iver's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Bon Iver's best-reviewed album here since 22, A Million (2016).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIY via Wikipediaby Ben Tipple | 5/5 | 100 | 2025 | “Soulful, almost spiritual in its delivery.” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Emma Keates | A- | 91 | 2025 | |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Donovan Livesey | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2025 | |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Michael Watkins | 9/10 | 90 | 2025 | “At this stage, Justin Vernon deserves our trust. As the creative force behind Bon Iver, one of the most successful alternative acts of the last two” |
| Beats Per Minuteby Grady Penna | 87% | 87 | 2025 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Alex Robert Ross | 8.1/10 | 81 | 2025 | |
| Rolling Stone Australiaby Neil Griffiths | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | “Justin Vernon is ready to break the murky cycle of sadness and heartbreak, and to walk into the light with new album 'SABLE, fABLE” |
| The Needle Dropby Anthony Fantano | 8/10 | 80 | 2025 | “One of Justin Vernon's most beautiful projects ever.” |
| PopMattersby Patrick Gill | 8/10 | 80 | 2025 | “Bon Iver's fifth studio LP SABLE, fABLE shifts from the stark beauty of the original EP to include uplifting sounds that are as enjoyable as they are personal.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Leah Lu | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | “Bon Iver's 'SABLE, fABLE' Review” |
| NME via Wikipediaby El Hunt | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | “Fans feared ‘SABLE, fABLE’ could be Bon Iver's big farewell, but instead his embrace of sunnier climes feels like a new chapter.” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby James Hall | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | |
| The Line of Best Fitby Tanatat Khuttapan | 7/10 | 70 | 2025 | “SABLE, fABLE gleams with heart-shaped eyes and an airy, soothing sunshine from Bon Iver.” |
| Cult Followingby Ewan Gleadow | 3/5 | 60 | Nov 7, 2025 | “Bon Iver brings a slow tone to SABLE, fABLE, and while it may be their sole studio trick, the tempo never offers a truly heartfelt moment.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra | 2.5/5 | 50 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
SABLE, fABLE in Bon Iver's catalog
How these critics usually treat Bon Iver
- AllMusic Harsher than usual32 points below the other critics here. Usually 14 points below on Bon Iver's other albums (4).
- The Line of Best Fit Harsher than usual11 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Bon Iver's other albums (3).
- Rolling Stone Kinder than usualLevel with the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on Bon Iver's other albums (4).
- The A.V. Club About usual for them12 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Bon Iver's other albums (3).
- musicOMH About usual for them11 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Bon Iver's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Bon Iver's other albums (4).
More from Bon Iver
More Pop from around 2025
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply