Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.
By the numbers: Bon Iver's best-reviewed album here since Bon Iver (2011). Scores ran from 40 (The Guardian) to 100 (NME).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Hannah Mylrea | 5/5 | 100 | 2019 | “For the fourth Bon Iver album Justin Vernon combines the sounds of his past three LPs, a satisfying mix that points to an uncertain future.” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Leah Greenblatt | A- | 91 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Matthew Strauss | 8.8/10 | 88 | 2019 | “On his fourth album, Justin Vernon reassembles the familiar Bon Iver elements like a cubist collage, with his voice fearlessly front and center. The result is his most honest and…” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2019 | “Conjuring dread and hopefulness, Justin Vernon's latest blends electronic and acoustic elements into a soulful, kaleidoscopic whole.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra | 2.5/5 | 50 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Ben Beaumont-Thomas | 2/5 | 40 | 2019 | “Justin Vernon has been building Bon Iver into an artistic commune of shared ideals – but loses his way in a fog of weak melodies and bad poetry” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Bon Iver
More Indie & Alternative from around 2019
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply