Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 54 to 100.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Kings of Leon's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Youth and Young Manhood (80). Scores ran from 54 (Pitchfork) to 100 (The Independent).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Noel Murray | A- | 91 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Clark Collis | A- | 91 | ||
| musicOMHby John Murphy | 4/5 | 80 | 2007 | “At first glance, it would appear that not much has changed in the world of Kings Of Leon. The bizarre haircuts and facial hair combinations are present” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 4/5 | 80 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Because Of The Times on Rolling Stone.com.” | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Leonie Cooper | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| NME via Wikipediaby Barry Nicolson | 8/10 | 80 | “After the four-year party, the Followills come of age on Because of the Times. Read the NME album review.” | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Roque Strew | 5.4/10 | 54 | “Former Southern Strokes aim to become the Southern U2 on this, their third album.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Kings of Leon
More Indie & Alternative from around 2007
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply