Based on 13 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 90.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (musicOMH) to 90 (Uncut).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 9/10 | 90 | 2013 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Ray Rahman | B+ | 88 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Jacob Oller | B- | 81 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “Kings of Leon may be overstating the dramatic nature of their comeback, but they do sound on fine form, writes Dave Simpson” |
| Spinby Jem Aswad | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: September 24, 2013Label: RCAThe strangest thing about Kings of Leon's first album since a three-year hiatus is how much” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Mechanical Bull on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| PopMatters | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “In the '90s, after Metallica's Black Album led to an explosion in Metallica's mainstream popularity, the band was met with the obligatory accusations of” |
| Slantby Caleb Caldwell | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | “Kings of Leon manages to muster enough rigor and discipline to keep Mechanical Bull kicking.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Matthew Horton | 6/10 | 60 | 2013 | “Kings Of Leon are the ex you can’t forget about. As relationships go, it started so well – all wild passion, snogging on scuzzy street corners and staying up all…” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Kevin Harley | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | |
| musicOMHby Kate Bennett | 2/5 | 40 | 2013 | “You either like Caleb Followill’s singing or you don’t. For some, the Kings Of Leon frontman’s lived-in, scratchy twang adds a layer of emotional depth” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Kings of Leon
More Indie & Alternative from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply