Critics give The Haunted Man a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 84.
The verdict on The Haunted Man
7 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 84 Pitchfork
- Lowest 60 The Independent and The Telegraph
- Career #3 of Bat for Lashes's 4 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Bat for Lashes's best-reviewed album here since Two Suns (2009).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 8.4/10 | 84 | 2012 | “Spacious, boldly orchestrated, and emotionally rich, Natasha Khan's latest is another step forward for the multi-instrumentalist and singer-songwriter. Featuring collaborations with Beck, Rob Ellis, David Sitek, Portishead's Adrian Utley, and…” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Annie Zaleski | B- | 81 | 2012 | “Bat For Lashes: The Haunted Man” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: October 16, 2012Label: ParlophoneBat for Lashes is cool with chilling in the cut. For all her elaborate songs, her” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Ben Hewitt | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “Flaunting one’s flesh can seem like a lazy way of getting a few column inches by popping the odd pair of pervy eyeballs out of their sockets. For someone whose…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “Alexis Petridis: Natasha Khan's new album is all the better for being more streamlined – and it should shake off her 'kooky' reputation” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2012 | “Check out our album review of Artist's The Haunted Man on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 | |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Bat for Lashes
More Rock from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply