The Bride

Bat for Lashes – The Bride: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for The Bride by Bat for Lashes
Released July 1, 2016
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Bat for Lashes

The Bride

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 10 critics · 70% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval70%7 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 12 points of each other

Critics give The Bride a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 88.

The verdict on The Bride

7 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Slant: 70Rolling Stone: 70AllMusic: 70Pitchfork: 76Q: 80NME: 80The Guardian: 80DIY: 80The Telegraph: 80The A.V. Club: 88 Breakdown 77
The gist
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Katie Rife B+ 88 2016 “Bat For Lashes tries to keep the flame alive on The Bride”
Q via Wikipediaby George Garner 4/5 80 2016
NME via Wikipediaby Larry Bartleet 4/5 80 2016
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rachel Aroesti 4/5 80 2016
DIY via Wikipediaby Nina Keen 4/5 80 2016 “Both achingly sad and strangely uplifting, Bat For Lashes’ tragic honeymoon concept album arrives fully-formed.”
The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick 4/5 80 2016
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Cameron Cook 7.6/10 76 2016 “Natasha Khan's latest album as Bat For Lashes is a richly theatrical concept album detailing the story of a woman left at the altar after the husband dies in a…”
Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani 3.5/5 70 2016 “The album works best as a song cycle rather than a collection of pop hooks.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kory Grow 3.5/5 70 2016 “Check out our album review of Artist's The Bride on Rolling Stone.com.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 3.5/5 70

The Bride in Bat for Lashes's catalog

75Fur and Gold (2006): 8686Two Suns (2009): 7878The Haunted Man (2012): 7676The Bride (2016): 7777This oneLost Girls (2019): 757520062019
Bat for Lashes's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Bat for Lashes album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Bat for Lashes

  • AllMusic Harsher than usual8 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Bat for Lashes's other albums (4).
  • The A.V. Club About usual for them12 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Bat for Lashes's other albums (3).
  • The Guardian About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Bat for Lashes's other albums (3).
  • NME About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Bat for Lashes's other albums (3).
  • Rolling Stone About usual for them8 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Bat for Lashes's other albums (3).
  • Pitchfork About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Bat for Lashes's other albums (4).

More from Bat for Lashes

See all Bat for Lashes albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2016

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply