Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
By the numbers: Sigur Rós's best-reviewed album here since Kveikur (2013). Scores ran from 60 (The Guardian) to 100 (The Arts Desk).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Joe Muggs | 5/5 | 100 | “It’s easy to take Sigur Rós’s emotive force for granted. So ubiquitous has their 2005 “Hoppípolla” been on everything from talent shows to apocalyptic environmental collapse documentaries to lyrical scenes…” | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Marcy Donelson | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Paste via Wikipediaby Devon Chodzin | 8.4/10 | 84 | 2023 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Max Heilman | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | “Your daily dose of the best music, film and comedy news, reviews, streams, concert listings, interviews and other exclusives on Exclaim!” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Andrew Trendell | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “Without a drummer but with an old friend back in the line-up, the post-rock pioneers return with their first album in a decade and their best since the now classic…” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | “Has it really been so long…? Pre-match hype bills ‘ÁTTA’ as the first new album from Sigur Rós in almost a decade, and a quick check on streaming reveals” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 7.2/10 | 72 | 2023 | |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia | 3.4/5 | 68 | “Sigur Ros – ÁTTA review: Attantion please” | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Phil Mongredien | 3/5 | 60 | 2023 | “With ambient strings and language-less vocals to the fore, the Icelandic art-rockers’ first album in a decade is in danger of washing right over you” |
More from Sigur Rós
More Indie & Alternative from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply