( )

Sigur Rós – ( ): B-Side Breakdown 83 (B) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for ( ) by Sigur Rós
Released October 23, 2002
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sigur Rós

( )

83
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 9 critics · 89% approval
B-Side Breakdown83Grade: B
Approval89%8 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Sigur Rós's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Ágætis byrjun (83). The sixth best-reviewed album of 2002 we've tracked.

020406080100NME: 70Pitchfork in 2002: 76Q: 80Rolling Stone: 80AllMusic: 80Pitchfork in 2022: 82Entertainment Weekly: 88Los Angeles Times: 88Alternative Press: 100 Breakdown 83
The gist
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B+ 88
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3.5/4 88 “Sigur Ros, in a language all its own Sigur Ros Untitled *** 1/2, MCA Who knows what Sigur Ros singer Jon Thor Birgisson is actually singing at any given time…”
Pitchfork in 2022 via Wikipedia 8.2/10 82 2022
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Pitchfork in 2002 via Wikipedia 7.6/10 76 2002
NME via Wikipedia 7/10 70 “They sing, when they can be bothered, in an invented language called ‘Hopelandish’. They perform at capital-A art events with names like Odin’s Magic Raven. And now their third album…”

More from Sigur Rós

See all Sigur Rós albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2002

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply