In Case We Die

Architecture in Helsinki – In Case We Die: B-Side Breakdown 76 (C) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for In Case We Die by Architecture in Helsinki
Released April 4, 2005
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Architecture in Helsinki

In Case We Die

76
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 10 critics · 60% approval
B-Side Breakdown76Grade: C
Approval60%6 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Critics give In Case We Die a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.

The verdict on In Case We Die

6 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

  • Highest 90 PopMatters and AllMusic
  • Lowest 60 Uncut, Rolling Stone and Mojo
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Architecture in Helsinki's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Fingers Crossed (74).
020406080100Uncut: 60Rolling Stone: 60Mojo: 60Spin: 65NME: 80The Independent: 80Pitchfork: 88Entertainment Weekly: 88PopMatters: 90AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 76
The gist
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Dave Heaton 9/10 90 2005
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4.5/5 90
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Rob Mitchum 8.8/10 88 2005 “The Aussie octet's latest LP is reminiscent of the ecstatic impatience and pretentious-pop charm of the Fiery Furnaces' Blueberry Boat and Animal Collective's Sung Tongs, with multiple metamorphoses within each…”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Brian M. Raftery B+ 88 2005
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2005
The Independent via Wikipediaby Luiza Sauma 4/5 80 2005
Spin via Wikipedia D 65 2005
Uncut via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2005
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christian Hoard 3/5 60 2005
Mojo via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2005

More from Architecture in Helsinki

See all Architecture in Helsinki albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2005

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply