Critics give Places Like This a B-Side Breakdown of 67 (D+), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 81.
The verdict on Places Like This
Most critics weren't won over: 3 of 8 liked it.
- Highest 81 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 50 AllMusic
- Career #3 of Architecture in Helsinki's 3 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Andy Greenwald | B- | 81 | 2007 | |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Scott Shetler | 4/5 | 80 | 2007 | “Places Like This gushes with the manic energy of its predecessor.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 4/5 | 80 | 2007 | “(Talem Bend/Cooperative Music)” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Rob Mitchum | 6.4/10 | 64 | 2007 | “More unorthodox arrangements from a diverse Australian assemblage that is able to appear at various times as a blippy dance-punk outfit, a marching band, an a capella group, a children's…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 3/5 | 60 | 2007 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Adam Bunch | 6/10 | 60 | 2007 | “The revolution is coming. That's what they tell me anyway. I might not see in my own concert and club-going experience, but apparently the days of indie kids” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Billy Hamilton | 6/10 | 60 | 2007 | “Have Architecture In Helsinki (AIH) – Australia’s heroically bizarre experimental-pop stalwarts – returned to resurrect those long-forgotten days o…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2007 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Architecture in Helsinki
More Indie & Alternative from around 2007
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply