Early reviews. Critics give Idols an early B-Side Breakdown of 58 (F), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Idols
Critics split on this one: 2 of 6 liked it.
- Highest 80 Kerrang! and Dork
- Outlier 20 The Arts Desk, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #2 of Yungblud's 2 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Yungblud's best-reviewed album here since Yungblud (2022).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Rachel Roberts | 4/5 | 80 | Jun 16, 2025 | “It’s YUNGBLUD like you’ve never heard him before. The 27-year-old Doncaster misfit explores self-belief and the power of change with the first part of his…” |
| Dork via Wikipediaby Neive McCarthy | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 28, 2025 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2025 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Maura Johnston | 3/5 | 60 | Jun 21, 2025 | |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Luke Winstanley | 4/10 | 40 | Jun 18, 2025 | “Yungblud's sights are set on conquering arenas and stadiums with Idols, while showing great reverence for the sounds of the 90s.” |
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Guy Oddy | 1/5 | 20 | Jun 21, 2025 | “Yungblud has declared his fourth album, Idols, to be a “a project with no limitations”. This is quite a claim. So, what musical wonders has Dominic Harrison created in collaboration with…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Yungblud
More Rock from around 2025
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply