Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 20 to 85.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 20 (Pitchfork) to 85 (Entertainment Weekly).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Kyle Anderson | B | 85 | ||
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Leonie Cooper | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “Much has already been made of Mumford & Sons’ abandonment of their beloved banjos for album number three. Yet anyone who’s seen the quartet live – which, when you consider…” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Out go the banjos, accordions and acoustic guitars, in favour of surging electric guitar riffs and Ben Lovett’s synth and organ textures” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Tim Grierson | C | 75 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Wilder Mind on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Andrew Unterberger | 5/10 | 50 | 2015 | “5SPIN Rating: 5 of 10Release Date: May 07, 2015Label: Island / GlassnoteHere's a sentence that would've made absolutely no sense in 2005 (and only” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 2.5/5 | 50 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 2/5 | 40 | 2015 | “They’ve shed the banjos, the neckerchiefs and the campfire stomping – and come up with something even more flat, beige and ordinary” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Maud Deitch | 2.0/10 | 20 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Mumford & Sons
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply