Critics give Warpaint a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 57 to 90.
The verdict on Warpaint
6 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 NME
- Lowest 57 Pitchfork
- Career #2 of Warpaint's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Warpaint's best-reviewed album here since The Fool (2010).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Kate Lloyd | 9/10 | 90 | 2014 | “When Los Angeles band Warpaint’s debut album ‘The Fool’ came out in late 2010, it was a soundtrack to late-night, solitary strolls through empty streets. It came on like an…” |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2014 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Kevin McFarland | B | 85 | 2014 | “Warpaint’s sophomore album splits between cold grooves and dark discord” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Kevin Harley | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Spin via Wikipediaby Garrett Kamps | 7/10 | 70 | 2014 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: January 21, 2014Label: Rough TradeThe first and last time I saw Spiritualized — seated in the balcony of Hollywood's” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Marchese | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2014 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Warpaint on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 3/5 | 60 | 2014 | “Warpaint's second album is so muted and restrained as to be barely there, but close listening does reap some rewards, writes Alexis Petridis” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 5.7/10 | 57 | 2014 | “The Los Angeles band Warpaint's three-years-in-the-making second album, featuring cover art from acclaimed video director Chris Cunningham, was produced by Flood and mixed by Nigel Godrich.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Warpaint
More Indie & Alternative from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply