Version

Mark Ronson – Version: B-Side Breakdown 66 (D) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Version by Mark Ronson
Released April 14, 2007
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Mark Ronson

Version

66
B-Side BreakdownGrade D · 6 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown66Grade: D
Approval50%3 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 36 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 33 (Pitchfork) to 85 (Stylus Magazine).

020406080100Pitchfork: 33Rolling Stone: 60AllMusic: 60DIY: 80The Guardian: 80Stylus Magazine: 85 Breakdown 66
The gist
Stylus Magazine via Wikipedia B 85
DIY via Wikipediaby Emma Swann 4/5 80 2007
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 4/5 80 2007
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3/5 60
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 3/5 60 2007
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Adam Moerder 3.3/10 33 2007 “The hip-hop/nu-soul producer who played a large role in recent albums by Lily Allen and Amy Winehouse enlists some famous friends for a covers album that includes takes on songs…”

More from Mark Ronson

See all Mark Ronson albums ranked

More Pop from around 2007

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply