Unorthodox Jukebox

Bruno Mars – Unorthodox Jukebox: B-Side Breakdown 72 (C-) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Unorthodox Jukebox by Bruno Mars
Released December 7, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Bruno Mars

Unorthodox Jukebox

72
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 7 critics · 57% approval
B-Side Breakdown72Grade: C-
Approval57%4 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Bruno Mars's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of 24K Magic (72). Scores ran from 50 (AllMusic) to 91 (Entertainment Weekly).

020406080100AllMusic: 50Slant: 60The Guardian: 60PopMatters: 80Rolling Stone: 80Spin: 80Entertainment Weekly: 91 Breakdown 72
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Melissa Maerz A- 91
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Matt Cibula 8/10 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jody Rosen 4/5 80 “Check out our album review of Artist's Unorthodox Jukebox on Rolling Stone.com.”
Spin via Wikipediaby Dan Hyman 8/10 80 “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: December 11, 2012Label: AtlanticAt first, Bruno Mars seemed an unlikely pop star. There he was, suddenly, in the summer”
Slant via Wikipediaby Andrew Chan 3/5 60 “There isn’t anything remotely unorthodox about Bruno Mars’s Unorthodox Jukebox.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan 3/5 60 “Bruno Mars's second album contains more clinically perfect songcraft, and also some rather unpleasant sentiments, writes Caroline Sullivan”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra 2.5/5 50

More from Bruno Mars

See all Bruno Mars albums ranked

More Pop from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply