Critics give Pre-Millennium Tension a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
The verdict on Pre-Millennium Tension
Most critics liked it: 9 of 10 liked it.
- Highest 100 Chicago Tribune
- Outlier 60 NME, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #3 of Tricky's 8 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 4/4 | 100 | 1996 | “Tricky Pre-Millennium Tension (Island) (star) (star) (star) (star) Pushing beyond the trip-hop borders of the 1995 “Maxinquaye,” British producer-rapper Tricky draws on and subverts several genres, including hip-hop, drums…” |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | A- | 91 | 1996 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Charles Aaron | 9/10 | 90 | 1996 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne | B- | 81 | 1996 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jason Fine | 4/5 | 80 | 1996 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ryan Schreiber | 8.0/10 | 80 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby David Bennun | 4/5 | 80 | 1996 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| NME via Wikipediaby Simon Williams | 6/10 | 60 | 1996 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Tricky
← Earlier Nearly God (1996)Later → Angels with Dirty Faces (1998)
More Electronic from around 1996
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply