Tango n’ Vectif

Mike Paradinas – Tango n’ Vectif: B-Side Breakdown 91 (A-) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for Tango n’ Vectif by Mike Paradinas
Released November 21, 1993
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Mike Paradinas

Tango n’ Vectif

91
B-Side BreakdownGrade A- · 3 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown91Grade: A-
Approval100%3 of 3 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Tango n’ Vectif an early B-Side Breakdown of 91 (A-), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Tango n’ Vectif

So far, 3 of 3 critics liked it.

  • Highest 100 AllMusic
  • Lowest 80 Select
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Mike Paradinas's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Lunatic Harness (83).
020406080100Select: 80Pitchfork: 94AllMusic: 100 Breakdown 91
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Sean Cooper 5/5 100
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Malcolm III Seymour 9.4/10 94 2001 “In 1993, before the IDM phenomenon had drawn enough recognition to merit so muchn as a name, David Toop …”
Select via Wikipediaby Rupert Howe 4/5 80 2004

Tango n’ Vectif in Mike Paradinas's catalog

75Tango n’ Vectif (1993): 9191This oneIn Pine Effect (1995): 7777Lunatic Harness (1997): 8383Royal Astronomy (1999): 7474Duntisbourne Abbots Soulmate Devastation Technique (2007): 73732007
Mike Paradinas's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Mike Paradinas album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Mike Paradinas

  • AllMusic About usual for them13 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Mike Paradinas's other albums (4).

More from Mike Paradinas

See all Mike Paradinas albums ranked

More Electronic from around 1993

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply