Early reviews. Critics give Native Invader an early B-Side Breakdown of 74 (C), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Native Invader
4 of 7 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 Spill Magazine, AllMusic and PopMatters
- Lowest 60 Slant
- Career Tied for #7 of Tori Amos's 13 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spill Magazineby Aaron Badgley | 8.0/10 | 80 | 2017 | “Tori Amos Native Invader Decca I love Tori Amos and I look forward to each new release. However, her last few releases did not live up to her potential or,…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Neil Z. Yeung | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| PopMatters | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “It's always hard to know what to expect with a new Tori Amos album. Early in her solo career, label executives attempted to neatly pigeonhole her as the "girl” |
| Pitchforkby Maura Johnston | 7.5/10 | 75 | 2017 | “The 15th album from one of pop’s most inventive composers as a braid of political, maternal, and celestial statements. Amos’ intricately arranged songs are passionate and despairingly poetic.” |
| Pasteby Libby Cudmore | 7.1/10 | 71 | 2017 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| musicOMHby John Murphy | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2017 | “With this mix of the personal and political, she still sounds as vital and exciting as she did 25 years ago” |
| Slantby Sal Cinquemani | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 | “Like 'Scarlet's Walk,' Tori Amos's 'Native Invader' is a concept album that surveys America post-catastrophe.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Tori Amos
← Earlier Unrepentant Geraldines (2014)Later → Ocean to Ocean (2021)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply