Scarlet’s Walk

Tori Amos – Scarlet’s Walk: B-Side Breakdown 80 (B-) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Scarlet’s Walk by Tori Amos
Released October 28, 2002
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Tori Amos

Scarlet’s Walk

80
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 7 critics · 71% approval
B-Side Breakdown80Grade: B-
Approval71%5 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Tori Amos's best-reviewed album here since Boys for Pele (1996). The third best-reviewed Rock album of 2002 we've tracked.

020406080100Entertainment Weekly: 61Rolling Stone: 70Stylus Magazine: 78Alternative Press: 80Spin: 90PopMatters: 90AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 80
Spin via Wikipedia 9/10 90
PopMatters via Wikipedia 9/10 90
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Stylus Magazine via Wikipedia C+ 78
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia D- 61

More from Tori Amos

See all Tori Amos albums ranked

More Rock from around 2002

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply