Critics give A Deeper Understanding a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.
The verdict on A Deeper Understanding
8 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 91 The A.V. Club
- Outlier 60 The Independent, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #3 of The War on Drugs's 4 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The War on Drugs's best-reviewed album here since Lost in the Dream (2014).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Matt Gerardi | A- | 91 | 2017 | “The War On Drugs’ biggest album thrives on its smallest details” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Richardson | 8.7/10 | 87 | 2017 | “The obsessive studio work of Adam Granduciel creates a hermetic experience like no other. A Deeper Understanding is his most layered and meticulous album, a twilight world in which to…” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Jason Anderson | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Our take on the latest from the Dylan-loving guitar romantics.” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Tune in and spin out, brothers and sisters. The War On Drugs new album is a dreamy album, perfect for roadtrips” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Gwilym Mumford | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Marcy Donelson | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from The War on Drugs
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply